Sunday, October 19, 2014

James Alfred Warthen (1876-1931) and Ruth Bowen (1872-1938) divorce proceedings: Part 4


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT,
COUNTY OF UTAH, STATE OF UTAH
----oOo----

MOTION TO ALTER AND AMEND DECREE

RUTH B. WARTHEN,
               Plaintiff.

     vs.

JAMES ALFRED WARTHEN,
Defendant.

----oOo----

Comes now the defendant, James Alfred Warthen, and moves the court to alter and amend the decree entered in the above entitled cause on the 20th day of November, 1926, to give the defendant, James Alfred Warthen, the custody and control of the said minor children, to-wit: Sterling Warthen, Paul Warthen, Alden [sic] B. Warthen, Janice Warthen and Dean Warthen; also to amend the amount of alimony to be paid to the plaintiff and also to alter and amend the courts decree relative to the possession and control of the family home in Springville, Utah, said motion to be based upon affidavits and evidence introduced at the hearing of this motion.

Abe W. Turner
Attorney for Defendant.
Knight Block, Provo, Utah.

Received a copy of said Motion this _____ day of ________________,
1927.

__________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT,
COUNTY OF UTAH, STATE OF UTAH.
----oOo----

AFFIDAVIT.

RUTH B. Warthen,
               Plaintiff.

vs.

JAMES ALFRED WARTHEN
               Defendant.
----oOo----

STATE OF UTAH
COUNTY OF UTAH

James Alfred Warthen, being first duly sworn, depose and says: that a decree was duly entered in the above entitled cause on or about the 20th day of November, 1926 and that by the terms of said decree, the plaintiff Ruth B. Warthen, was given the custody and control of the minor children, to-wit: Sterling Warthen, Paul Warthen, Alden [sic] B. Warthen, Janice Warthen and Dean Warthen; and that the family home at Springville, Utah was to be provided for the said plaintiff, Ruth B. Warthen, and said minor children save that the defendant, James Alfred Warthen, was to have one room in said home reserved for his use and benefit and that by the terms of said decree, defendant was to pay the plaintiff the sum of $35.00 as alimony for the support of said plaintiff and minor children.

Affiant says that the home at Springville, Utah, mentioned in the decree in the above entitled cause is not now occupied by the said Ruth B. Warthen and the minor children and that there is no room in the home reserved or been reserved for the use and benefit of said James Alfred Warthen but on the contrary the room that was to have been reserved for the said James Alfred Warthen has been rented out by the said Ruth B. Warthen and the said Ruth B. Warthen has received the rentals from said room; that at this time the said Ruth B. Warthen is living at Spanish Fork, Utah County, Utah with some of her relatives and that the children aforementioned have been taken out of the schools at Springville, Utah and their schooling has been bfoken [sic] up.

That the family home at Springville, Utah at this time, is unoccupied and that all of the furnishings and household effects have bean taken away from the said family home at Springville; that the room that was to have been set aside for the defendants [sic] use has been stripped of all its furnishings and that it is of no use to the said defendant in its present condition; that the said family home is not being taken care of, that the same is being fun [sic] down for want of care and the protection of an interested occupant and that the ground has not been cared for and has not been cultivated or cleaned and that in every way the said property is decreasing in value; that the said property is being purchased under a contract and is only partially paid for and that affiant has been advised that unless the place be given better care, that the payments on same be made up, some action will be taken to dispossess said affiant and said Ruth B. Warthen of any and all interest they have in the said premises; that said affiant believes that it is absolutely necessary that he be given the custody and control of the said family home.

That the minor children aforementioned have not been given proper care and attention by Ruth B. Warthen during the period in which the aforementioned decree has been in operation and effect; that the said children have been left  for hours and days at a time without any one to care for them, to cook their meals and to see to keeping the said children clean and healthful; that affiant has provided considerable food, fuel and clothing for the minor children aforementioned and food and fuel for the benefit of the said Ruth B. Warthen; that said Ruth B. Warthen has refused and does now refuse to give the said James Alfred Warthen credit for providing the aforementioned food, fuel and clothing but she, the said Ruth B. Warthen, has repeatedly told and published the story that said James Alfred
Warthen has never provided anything for the said children since the first of April of this year.

That affiant has been informed that said Ruth B. Warthen has sent the said minor child, Dean Warthen, out of the state of Utah, to-it; To California, to be kept by his sister and that affiant is informed that the said sister is having to make her own living and pay for her own board and keep, that she is in no position to properly care for the said child; that the said child was sent to California primarily to aggravate and annoy this affiant; that affiant believes that the best interest of the children, their health, their upbringing and their schooling will be gained by giving to him the custody and control of said children and that he might have the family home, together with the household effects at Springville, Utah for the said children to live in.

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 29th day of November, A.D. 1927

Abe. W. Turner
Notary Public
Residing at Provo, Utah.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT 0F THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, 
COUNTY OF UTAH, SATE OF UTAH.
------------------

NOTICE.

RUTH B. WARTHEN,
               Plaintiff.

     vs.

JAMES ALFRED WARTHEN,
               Defendant.
------------------

To Morgan & Coleman, attorneys-at-law and attorneys of record for the plaintiff, Ruth B. Warthen, and to Ruth B. Warthen, plaintiff.

You and each of you will please take notice that the defendant, James Alfred Warthen will, on the 10th day of December, 1927, at ten o'clock A.M., or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, move the court to alter and amend its decree made in the above entitled cause and entered on the 20th day of November, A.D. 1926.

Abe. W. Turner
Attorney for Defendant.
P.O. Address: Knight Block,
Provo, Utah.

Received copy of above notice this 29th day of November - 1927

State of Utah

County of Utah.


Abe W . Turner , being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that he is attorney for the defendant James Alfred Warthen , in the above entitled action; that he has his law offices in the Knight Block at Provo City, Utah that he served a copy of the attached notice together with a copy of the affidavit and motion in the above entitled cause, upon the plaintiff Ruth B. Warthen, on the 30th day of November A.D. 1927 by depositing a copy of said notice, motion and affidavit, enclosed in an envelop [sic], in the U.S. Post Office, at Provo City, Utah; that the said envelop [sic] was addressed to Ruth B. Warthen, Spanish Fork, Utah; that the postage on same was fully paid; that the plaintiff is now residing at Spanish Fork, Utah County, Utah and that there is daily communication by mail between Provo, Utah, and Spanish Fork, Utah; that the service was made after having tried to serve Morgan & Coleman, attorneys, who refused to accept service for the said Ruth B. Warthen.

Abe W. Turner

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th of December A.D. 1927.

I. G. Bench
Notary Public,
Provo, Utah

My commission expires March 22, 1931.

James Alfred Warthen (1876-1931) and Ruth Bowen (1872-1938) divorce proceedings: Part 3

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4

DECREE OF DIVORCE:

[The information here is almost exactly the same as the conclusions of law, found in Part 2. The judge grants everything in that section.]

In the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District
of the
State of Utah, County of Utah

Judgment Roll Certificate:
Ruth B. Warthen
                    Plaintiff
Jas. Alfred Warthen
                    Defendant

I, the undersigned Clerk of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Utah, in and for Utah County, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true copy of the Judgment entered in the above entitled action, and I further certify that the foregoing papers, hereto annexed, constitute the Judgment Roll in said action.

Witness my hand and the seal of said Court
this 20 day of Nov. 1926
W.M. Hales
Clerk
By __________________________
Deputy Clerk

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
IN AND FOR UTAH COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AFFIDAVIT:

RUTH B. WARTHEN,
                    Plaintiff,
          vs.
James Alfred Warthen,
                    Defendant,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE OF UTAH
COUNTY OF UTAH
w / Ruth, B.Warthen, Peing first duly sworn, on her oath, deposes and says; that she is the plaintiff mentioned in the-above entitled action; that she has heretofore, to wit: on the 20th. day of November, 1926, obtained from this Court a decree and judgment of divorce and for the payment of alimony and attorney's fees, to-wit: that said defendant pay into this court the sum of $30.00 on or before the 31st day of December, 1926, as attorney's fee, and that said defendant pay to the plaintiff as alimony for the support of herself and minor children the sum of $35.00 per month, payable as follows: $17.00 on or before November 10, 1926, and an additional $17.00 on or before the 10th. day of each and every following month, and also $18.00 on or before November 25, 1926, and an additional $18.00 on or before the 25th. day of each and every following month; that said defendant has wilfully and contumaciously failed, neglected and refused to comply with the terms of said decree, in this, that said defendant has not paid to the plaintiff, or the Clerk of this Court for the use of the plaintiff, any of said alimony so ordered to be paid by the court, to-wit: the sum of $35.00 during the month of May, 1927, $35.00 during the month of June, 1927, $35.00 during the month of July, 1927, $35.00 during the month of August, 1927, except that defendant has paid $15.00 on said alimony.

WHEREFORE, plaintiff asks that the said defendant James Alfred Warthen be ordered to appear before this Court and show cause why he should not be punished for a contempt of court.

Ruth B. Warthen

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 8 day of September, 1927.

Jacob Coleman

Residing at: Provo City, Utah.
My commission expires ____________________________


SHERIFF’S OFFICE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
State of Utah,
County of Summit

I, J. C. Clark, Sheriff in and for the County of Summit and State of tah, do hereby certify and return that I received the within and hereto annexed summons have served on the 10th day of Sept. A.D. 1927, and served the same upon James A. Warthen, Defenfant, by delivering and leaving with order to show cause a true copy of said summons order in Park City, Summit County, State of Utah, on the 10th day of Sept. A.D. 1927.

I further certify that on the copy of summons so served I endorsed the date and place of service and added my name and official title thereto.

Dated at Park City, Utah, this 10 day of Sept. A.D. 192 . . . .

J.C. Clark
Sheriff of Summit County, Utah

By J. Frank Payne
Deputy


Fees:—
Service,  $ . . . . . . . . . . .
Mileage, $___________
Total,      $ . . . . . . . . . . .

IN DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN
AND FOR UTAH COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Ruth B. Warthen,
                    Plaintiff,
          vs.
James Alfred Warthen,
                    Defendant,
-------------------------------------------------------------------

To the defendant James Alfred Warthen,-

The petition of Ruth B. Warthen having been filed here-in setting out that you wilfully and contumaciously failed, refused and neglected to comply with the decree of this Court made and entered on the 20th. of November, 1928, wherein you were required to pay to said plaintiff the sum of $35.00 per month as alimony, payable as follows: $17.00 on or before November 10,1926, and an additional $17.00 on or before the 10th. day of each and every following month, and also $18.00 on or before November 25,1926, and an additional $18.00 on or before the.25th.. day of each and every following month, and also pay to Morgan and Coleman, plaintiff's attorneys, the sum of $30.00 as attorney's fees.

You are therefore ordered to be and appear before this Court in the court room of the county court house at Provo city, Utah County, Utah, on Saturday, the 17th day of September, 1927, at ten o'clock A.M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any you have, why you should not be adjudged guilty of contempt in not complying with the order of this Court, as is stated in the affidavit of said plaintiff.

Let a copy of this order, together with a copy of the affidavit of the plaintiff, be served upon the defendant James Alfred Warthen at least 5 days prior to the 17 day of September, 1927.

The Sheriff is hereby directed to serve this Order without cost to the plaintiff.

Dated at Provo City, Utah County, State of Utah, this 8th day of September, 1927.

BY THE COURT.

George P. Parker
Judge

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
IN AND FOR UTAH COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No. 6526 Civil
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order and Decree in Contempt.

Ruth B. Warthen,
               Plaintiff,
     vs.
James Alfred Warthen,
               Defendant,
-------------------------------------------------------

This matter came on duly and regularly for hearing before the court on the 17th. day of September, 1927, on the affidavit of the plaintiff and order to show cause why the defendant should not be required to comply with the terms of the decree entered and filed in the above entitled matter on November 20, 1926, Messrs Morgan and Coleman appearing as counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant appearing without counsel; and the Court having heard the evidence adduced on the part of the plaintiff and the defendant, the Court now makes the following,-

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That on November 20, 1926, a decree of divorce was rendered and filed in the above entitled Court and cause, wherein, among other things, said defendant was ordered to pay to plaintiff's attorneys the sum of $30.00 as balance of attorney's fees on or before December 3,1926; also that defendant pay to plaintiff as alimony for the support of herself and their said minor children the sum of $35.00 per month; that said defendant had full knowledge of said decree; that said defendant has wilfully and contumaciously failed and refused to comply with said decree, in this, that he has failed and refused to pay to plaintiff any alimony for the months of May, June, July, and August, 1927; and in open court said defendant told the Court that he would not comply with said decree by paying said alimony as provided for by said decree;

2. That said defendant has wilfully and contumaciously and does now wilfully and contumaciously violate said decree
________

From the foregoing Findings of Fact the Court now makes the following,-

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
That said defendant has wilfully and contumaciously violated the terms of said decree and is entitled to be punished for contempt.

Wherefore, by virtue of the premises, it is, by the Court, ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that you, James Alfred Warthen, defendant in the above entitled cause, be imprisoned in the County jail of Utah County, Utah, at hard labor, for a period of sixty (60) days.

Done in open court this 17 day of September, 1927.


BY THE COURT.

George P. Parker
Judge